FX-Brokers.eu
Menu
Trusted by traders25 brokers tested2,470+ pages indexedIndependent since 2024Updated daily

Trading 212 vs Exness

Head-to-head comparison of fees, platforms, regulation, and trading conditions to help you choose the right EU broker in 2026.

T2
Trading 212
Est. 2004 · London, UK
8.9
VS
E
Exness
Est. 2008 · Limassol, Cyprus
9.4

CFD risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs.

Quick Verdict

Trading 212
2 categories won
Tied
1 categories
Exness
4 categories won

Exness scores higher overall at 9.4/10 vs 8.9/10.

Score Comparison

OverallExness wins
Trading 2128.9
Exness9.4
Fees & CostsExness wins
Trading 2129.2
Exness9.5
PlatformsExness wins
Trading 2128.6
Exness9.2
RegulationTrading 212 wins
Trading 2129.2
Exness9.0
ExecutionExness wins
Trading 2128.8
Exness9.7
SupportExness wins
Trading 2128.5
Exness9.2
EducationTrading 212 wins
Trading 2128.4
Exness8.3
InstrumentsTie
Trading 2129.0
Exness9.0

Trading Conditions

ConditionTrading 212Exness
Min Deposit€1$10
EUR/USD Spread0.9 pips average0.0 pips (Raw), 0.3 pips (Pro), 1.0 pips (Standard)
CommissionNone (spread-only on CFDs, zero commission on stocks/ETFs)$3.50 per lot per side (Raw), None (Pro/Standard)
Leverage (Retail)30:130:1
Leverage (Pro)300:1Unlimited (offshore)
Swap-FreeNoYes
Withdrawal FeeFreeFree (instant withdrawals available)

Platform Comparison

Trading 212 Platforms

  • Trading 212 Web
  • Trading 212 App
Account Types:

Invest, CFD, ISA (UK only)

Exness Platforms

  • MetaTrader 4
  • MetaTrader 5
  • Exness Terminal
  • Exness App
Account Types:

Standard, Standard Cent, Pro, Raw Spread, Zero

Regulation & Safety

Trading 212 Regulation

FCAUKCySECCyprusFSCBulgaria
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000 (CySEC) / FSCS up to GBP 85,000 (UK)

Exness Regulation

CySECCyprusFCAUKFSASeychelles
ESMA CompliantYes
Neg. Balance ProtectionYes
Segregated FundsYes
Compensation Scheme

ICF up to EUR 20,000

Overall Verdict

WinnerExness9.4

Exness takes the overall win with a score of 9.4 vs 8.9, winning 4 out of 7 individual categories compared to Trading 212's 2.

In terms of costs, Exness also leads on fees. On the regulatory front, Exness though Trading 212 has a regulatory edge.

Choose Exness if you prioritise its strengths in the categories where it leads. Choose Trading 212 if you value the specific areas where it scores higher, such as regulation and education.

CFD Risk Warning

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This website is for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute investment advice. Trading leveraged products carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. EU retail leverage limits apply (ESMA): up to 30:1 on major FX pairs, 20:1 on minor FX, 20:1 on major indices, 10:1 on commodities, 5:1 on equities, 2:1 on crypto.